3 worst supreme court decisions7/22/2023 The candidates were also asked about the Wisconsin Supreme Court's decisions in the state's last round of redistricting, where conservative justices decided to approve a map that took a " least changes" approach to redistricting. My job is to apply the words and what they mean." Redistricting It doesn't matter to my job whether I liked the words or even agree with the law. "But stupid doesn't mean unconstitutional. "Sometimes, the words, or even the statutes themselves, are stupid," Dorow said. She did not address that case or provide another example in her answer to the question Monday, instead saying she would follow the law regardless of whether she liked it. Supreme Court decision overturning a Texas anti-sodomy law. In her application to the Waukesha County Circuit Court, the forum moderator said, Dorow cited the 2003 U.S. "And so I think that opinion stands up well as one of the worst opinions." "This is significant interference with the liberties that our Constitution protects," Kelly said. Scott Walker, where they were asked a similar question on their applications.Īt the time, Kelly, whom Walker appointed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court, cited a 2005 ruling that expanded the government's power of eminent domain, according to the forum moderator. Both were once appointed to judicial positions by former Republican Gov. Neither Kelly nor Dorow mentioned Roe in their answers. "My value is that women should be able to make their reproductive right decisions themselves," Protasiewicz said. Protasiewicz said she couldn't say where she would end up on the issue on a case involving abortion, but she said that she could share her personal values when it comes to the issue. Wade, to allow them to make their own decisions in regard to reproductive rights." "Three generations of women have counted on Roe v. "That is the epitome and definition of judicial activism," Protasiewicz said. Protasiewicz said she was surprised the U.S. "We're dealing with the consequences of the instability all throughout our country, and all throughout many people's lives right now," Mitchell said. Mitchell said the decision had left behind chaos where each state is making its own decisions about reproductive choice. "It was the first time in my study of the law that I can see that the Supreme Court went and took a right," Mitchell said. Wade and reversed decades of precedent guaranteeing abortion rights. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision, which overturned Roe v. ![]() Mitchell and Protasiewicz both listed U.S. While the candidates were not asked directly about abortion, the issue came up when they were asked to name the worst Supreme Court ruling they'd seen in the last 30 years. Here are some of the issues they addressed. The top two vote-getters will advance to the general election on April 4. The forum comes a little more than a month before voters head to the polls in a Feb. While the race is officially nonpartisan, Dorow and Kelly are supported by Republicans while Mitchell and Protasiewicz are backed by Democrats. The court currently has a 4-3 conservative majority, meaning the race could flip the ideological balance of the court. Waukesha County Judge Jennifer Dorow, former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Dan Kelly, Dane County Circuit Court Judge Everett Mitchell and Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Janet Protasiewicz are all seeking a 10-year term on the court to replace conservative Justice Patience Roggensack, who is retiring. The four candidates running for a pivotal seat on the Wisconsin Supreme Court laid out how they'd approach the job during a forum in Madison Monday, with some of the candidates sending strong signals about their views on issues like redistricting and abortion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |